Curse

Spazzer · Sep 25, 2007, 02:41 PM // 14:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by RhanoctJocosa

Spazzar, tell me, is your "gimped" character anywhere near the IOMLB/MGHSLRM title?

Yes, she is.

Shadowmoon · Sep 25, 2007, 04:10 PM // 16:10

/signed for either removal or add way to get it for everyone,
22 max titles without surviver. It retarded that there only 29 titles that my character can max, when survivers have 30, and surviver is easy as heck to get.
Btw, made a surviver paragon, max armor, elite skills, and weapons at lvl 2. Got runs to Lutz at lvl 12, hero faction farmed to LS
Surviver is as retardedly easy as ever.
Also everyone who say, "well i did it the "legit" way, not doin all those gimicks, people should think its a prestegous title"
Guess what, you did it the hard way. If got Protector will only using half my attribute points on me and my hero, should people feel like my protector title is elite, heck no.

And btw, to all the people who say i shouldn't get survivor becaused i died because i'm no longer a survivor, fine, when ur surviver character dies, you also loose the title, not matter what rank it is, because hey it died, it not a surviver anymore.

Arya Littlefinger · Sep 25, 2007, 04:34 PM // 16:34

I honestly don't see what the big deal is of having LDoA and Survivor unattainable for older characters, there are still 40 titles available without those two.

You just have to be willing to put up with the grind of pvp titles or farming gold for sweet tooth or even drunkard.

My main character isn't survivor and she has 18 titles maxed, I am not upset that she cannot be a survivor, because I know 30 titles is still a possibility. If we are looking at 2 years for GW2 I am fine with having the grind of maxing other titles, because it will give me something to do while I wait for the release.

Killed u man · Sep 25, 2007, 04:45 PM // 16:45

They are BOTH fine titles. They shouldn't be removed, not after 1 year of being around. They should, on the other hand, be changed... I've said this a million times, what's the point of having a title system, with a display to brag about them, when U CAN'T have all titles on one character... Look at HoM, Some people have a fully filled HoM with all their titles, and than another charcter just has Gwen from LDoA...

Change LDoA and Survivor to what they should have been since the beginning:

Survivor: 1,337,000 experience since LAST death, this wouldn't change the title, because people can still go for it withouth having a single dead, people who got disconnected atleast have a second (and third, etc...).
THIS WILL NOT CHEAPEN THE TITLE, BECAUSE INSTEAD OF JUST HAVING TO REMAKE THE CHARACTER (what 99% of the people do after they lost it), YOU CAN ACTUALLY JUST START AGAIN.
As soon as a player stays alive for the 1.3M experience, he's a survivor right? So I don't understand why people say this would cheapen the title, because someone has infite tries... If people are just bad, they won't get it anyways, and otherwise they would just farm it.

THERE IS NO REASON WHY THIS TITLE SHOULDN'T BE "Since LAST death"

LDoA: I know Anet is really stubborn about this one, because it was supposed to be a reward for people who found a way to get to level 20 in Pre-Searing, but that doesn't change the fact that THIS TITLE IS DISPLAYABLE, AND IT DOES COUNT TOWARDS KoaBD-track, and thus SHOULD BE ACCESSABLE FOR EVERYONE. There is a million ways they can fix this, OR by removing the title, and give the LVL20's in Pre another reward, but not something as game-breaking as a title. They can also revert an existing character to lvl1, remove skills etc, and send it back to Pre. Make it be like a flashback or anything.

ANET CAN fix this, they are just to lazy/stubborn. If enough people sign, the title system might actually make sense soon?!

Bouldershoulder · Sep 25, 2007, 04:50 PM // 16:50

I think Anet's idea of Survivor was that if you had enough skill to stay alive, then you get the titles. Now, moving them to the Lucky title track changes things. It's basically saying that they just got lucky, not that they are smart enough to avoid death.

Also, I don't want to get my title removed from something that is not necessarily needed.

payne · Sep 25, 2007, 04:58 PM // 16:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by JeniM

But wait for all the R3 people to arrive with their "i grinded for this" rant!

I will murder anybody who suggests this...happily...r3 suvivor on my para, absolute pain but I got it...looks awesome...remove title and I have nothing on him!

title shows determination and a certain level of ["rimmerness"(search for: red dwarf)] dont remove it or bad things will happen

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Wolf-KITB

They are either labelled as pointless grinders, or "Brave Sir Robins"

In case you are in any doubt that's a no from me.

"Brave Sir Robin ran away.
Bravely ran away, away!
When danger reared its ugly head,
He bravely turned his tail and fled.
Yes, brave Sir Robin turned about
And gallantly he chickened out.
Bravely taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat,
Bravest of the brave, Sir Robin!

He is packing it in and packing it up
And sneaking away and buggering up
And chickening out and pissing off home,
Yes, bravely he is throwing in the sponge..."

pretty much sums it all up ^^

Snow Bunny · Sep 25, 2007, 05:29 PM // 17:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Killed u man

They are BOTH fine titles. They shouldn't be removed, not after 1 year of being around. They should, on the other hand, be changed... I've said this a million times, what's the point of having a title system, with a display to brag about them, when U CAN'T have all titles on one character... Look at HoM, Some people have a fully filled HoM with all their titles, and than another charcter just has Gwen from LDoA...

Change LDoA and Survivor to what they should have been since the beginning:

Survivor: 1,337,000 experience since LAST death, this wouldn't change the title, because people can still go for it withouth having a single dead, people who got disconnected atleast have a second (and third, etc...).
THIS WILL NOT CHEAPEN THE TITLE, BECAUSE INSTEAD OF JUST HAVING TO REMAKE THE CHARACTER (what 99% of the people do after they lost it), YOU CAN ACTUALLY JUST START AGAIN.
As soon as a player stays alive for the 1.3M experience, he's a survivor right? So I don't understand why people say this would cheapen the title, because someone has infite tries... If people are just bad, they won't get it anyways, and otherwise they would just farm it.

THERE IS NO REASON WHY THIS TITLE SHOULDN'T BE "Since LAST death"

LDoA: I know Anet is really stubborn about this one, because it was supposed to be a reward for people who found a way to get to level 20 in Pre-Searing, but that doesn't change the fact that THIS TITLE IS DISPLAYABLE, AND IT DOES COUNT TOWARDS KoaBD-track, and thus SHOULD BE ACCESSABLE FOR EVERYONE. There is a million ways they can fix this, OR by removing the title, and give the LVL20's in Pre another reward, but not something as game-breaking as a title. They can also revert an existing character to lvl1, remove skills etc, and send it back to Pre. Make it be like a flashback or anything.

ANET CAN fix this, they are just to lazy/stubborn. If enough people sign, the title system might actually make sense soon?!

Uh huh. Sure...

dumbass.

I can farm 10 million experience on my monk if I want to at lvl 20. Without dying. Easily.

there are 40 titles you can get. Stop whining.

Solveig Ikram · Sep 25, 2007, 05:40 PM // 17:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillaKarl

actually your only down 1 title, LDOA and survivor are mutually exclusive, you can get surviovr, but u cant death level to LDOA,

and 2. i just finally got this title after 11 months, i earned it and it wouuld be UNFAIR to the ones who like me, have earned it, i sympathise with those who have chars older then the titles, and anet should maybe rework the title so that it only resets the xp counter, then everyone could get it, regardless of age

/notsign your idea
/sign my idea

/signed infinity

Necris · Sep 25, 2007, 05:40 PM // 17:40

Are you people still whining about this? Jesus Christ.

Killed u man · Sep 25, 2007, 05:55 PM // 17:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snow Bunny

Uh huh. Sure...

dumbass.

I can farm 10 million experience on my monk if I want to at lvl 20. Without dying. Easily.

there are 40 titles you can get. Stop whining.

Euhm, I don't understand your post fully, but really, did you have problems with your famility when you were young? Didnd't your mommy love you or somethign?

My POINT is that the title is already cheap, so U obviously didn't read my post (can U even read?), The survivor title is ALREADY cheap, So there is no reason why NOT to change it to experience since last death. (I know people who lagged out multiple times in a row, losing survivor at lvl1-2 each time) They had to remake the character, thus losing points towards drunkard, etc...

"There are 40 other titles?" That is completely IRRELEVANT, so what you are saying is that as long as there are enough other titles, BNET can add as many broken titles as they want? Why not add EMO-title (most deaths), or "runnning a zone in and out" (maxing at 10000 times), or "hours spend on dancing"...

No my friend, YOU are the "dumbass" here, with your ignorance... Whining? Geez, sorry I ONLY paid 100+$ for this game, and sorry for the fact that THIS IS A SUGGESTION FORUM... (godieinasewer plox)

Snow Bunny · Sep 25, 2007, 05:59 PM // 17:59

The title is cheap? Explain your definition of the word.

Moron.

Did you ever go to school? I'm leaning towards a no.

If you farm it since last death counter the title is even easier than it already is. Oh wait, 600/smiter GG.

FelixCarter · Sep 25, 2007, 06:13 PM // 18:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snow Bunny

The title is cheap? Explain your definition of the word.

Moron.

Did you ever go to school? I'm leaning towards a no.

If you farm it since last death counter the title is even easier than it already is. Oh wait, 600/smiter GG.

Every post you make, you always say a line, then say a derogatory word (You even use a period at the end of it, as if it were a sentence in itself.), then proceed to bash what you don't like/understand.

I don't understand why people are so obsessed with titles, anyways. Aren't they suppose to make the game... "Fun"?

Survivor doesn't sound "fun" to me, at all. Maybe to someone else, but I'm never gonna go for it.

I'll suggest (again) that ANet add a title that LDoA and Survivors can never obtain. This will allow everyone to achieve the same amount of titles using a different playing-style.

Survivors like the thrill of avoiding death.
LDaO enjoy breaking away from the "status quo".
The new title should be something very different from the above two.

Arya Littlefinger · Sep 25, 2007, 06:16 PM // 18:16

Survivor isn't a cheap title. Some of us have worked hard to get that title. I never played with others, so I can't be accused of leaving in the middle of a mission because I was about to die. My survivor beat NF and Factions and capped elites along the way to get the title. It was definately NOT cheap.

Killed u man · Sep 25, 2007, 06:19 PM // 18:19

Those smiters CAN die, even worse, as soon as something goes wrong, they pretty much die within seconds... Same for a 55, sure, some people 55'ed it, but I can guarantee you they were f*/cking focused on their screen, because as soon as 1 thing goes wrong, U die, after 1 hit...

I think you are missing this point:

THE WAY IT IS NOW:

Person X plays untill 1M experience, dies, deletes the character, thus losing all his accomplishments in other tracks (char based).
=> He Gets Another Chance for LS anyways, because U can KEEP on making character, so no matter what, YOU ALREADY DO HAVE INFINITE AMOUNTS OF TRIES...
All that pretty much happened is that he lost ALL his other tracks, so by dying, instead of losing survivor, BNET punished him on ALL his OTHER titles.
Anyways, he makes his next character, gets LS this time, and he's happy, even tough he had to redo alot of the work in other tracks...

THE WAY IT SHOULD BE:

Person X plays untill 1M experience, dies, and the track resets, BUT leaving him with the display of the last achieved title in the Survivor track (so U can still display your title after the death, only the experience gets rerolled to0). He DOESN'T have to delete that character, he just has to redo the grinding. HE DOESN'T lose his drunkard title, HE DOESN'T lose his sweet tooth, etc...

=> The way it is now, people are getting punished on other titles for dying, because they usually do remake the character anyways. (Most of the time the punishment is due the fact they lagged out, I'm sorry BNET, I will try and buy an even better connection next time, cuz obviously it isn't server-based problems)

Making it Experience since last dead would solve this problem + It would offer a small patch to the LDoA + LS problem.

P.S. reading the above post: YES, some people did get their LS in a fair way, but think about this, there is tons of other people like you, who just happened to get dc'ed... Don't these people deserve a second chance, WITHOUTH getting to lagg out?

The only reason I call Survivor "cheap' is because it is more luck-based than skill-based... Average ping lately: 300-500 (Ever since GWEN, Need I say more?)

mikez himself · Sep 25, 2007, 06:29 PM // 18:29

player hater

i had the same problem, i couldnt get one for my warrior because he was made before it, QQ moar?

i got the title on my ranger anyway, i dont see why you need to take away other peoples work just because you cant get it

Killed u man · Sep 25, 2007, 06:35 PM // 18:35

The problem is NOT people can't get it, really, if U CAN'T get survivor, U shouldn't play this game... I'm Sure I could get survivor, even worse, I'm sure I could get it this week, But I'm NOT trying, because I sometimes randomly dc's (about once a week, and it is server based, believe me, I don't live in a hut in the middle of a dessert in Africa, I have a good connection).

Also, once again, you failed to read, this counts for every Surivor thread, I have YET to see a guy complain about the fact he died due a fact that lies withitn his own reach.

So for once, and for all (Please, let this stop these redicilous posts):

YOU NEVER KNOW WHEN YOU ARE GOING TO DC, SO THE TITLE, NO MATTER WHAT HAS SOME LUCK INVOLVED!!! (Concidering the state of Bnet's servers, I would say a whole lot of luck!)

Why do you guys fail to see this guy his point? Like, sure, His solution would be remving the title, mine would be change it, either way, it's ABOUT A BROKEN TITLE, NOT BROKEN PEOPLE

Snow Bunny · Sep 25, 2007, 08:28 PM // 20:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by FelixCarter

Every post you make, you always say a line, then say a derogatory word (You even use a period at the end of it, as if it were a sentence in itself.), then proceed to bash what you don't like/understand.

I don't understand why people are so obsessed with titles, anyways. Aren't they suppose to make the game... "Fun"?

Survivor doesn't sound "fun" to me, at all. Maybe to someone else, but I'm never gonna go for it.

I'll suggest (again) that ANet add a title that LDoA and Survivors can never obtain. This will allow everyone to achieve the same amount of titles using a different playing-style.

Survivors like the thrill of avoiding death.
LDaO enjoy breaking away from the "status quo".
The new title should be something very different from the above two.

I understand every point made in this forum. It's just that most of them are bad. But way to analyze my posting style, I'll spare you a suitable epithet.

Let me ask you a question then.
LDoA rewards a lot of time invested in one action, and getting to Lvl 20 in pre, which, granted, takes quite a bit of effort & time.
Survivor takes patience, effort, and active management of your character so that you can't just crash through every mob you come to.

They both reward patience and dedication.

What would a title that neither can get reward? Impatience, bad playing, and lack of effort?

Good work, you are sticking up with those who have little to no personal responsibility, and want to be rewarded for said attitude.

Have fun with that. ::insert epithet::

Necris · Sep 25, 2007, 08:40 PM // 20:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arya Littlefinger

Survivor isn't a cheap title. Some of us have worked hard to get that title. I never played with others, so I can't be accused of leaving in the middle of a mission because I was about to die. My survivor beat NF and Factions and capped elites along the way to get the title. It was definately NOT cheap.

Yes. You can be blamed. That's what I'm doing right now.

You're trying to justify the existence of something that really means nothing, and in trying to attain that title, you frustrate the game for all the players on your team because you leave whenever you're about to get nicked.

mikez himself · Sep 25, 2007, 08:54 PM // 20:54

@ above, the person stated they went through the campaign with h/h, or at least with 'others'

Necris · Sep 25, 2007, 08:58 PM // 20:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikez himself

@ above, the person stated they went through the campaign with h/h, or at least with 'others'

I'm aware of that, my accusation was that these people, everyone really, are all making a big deal out of something as inconsequential as a title which can only be acquired by not dying.

The only way to not die in GW is to leave when you're just about to die, much to the chagrin of every other player in your party.